Briscoe LabDevelopmental Dynamics of Tissue Formation

Research

Gene regulation

Cis-regulatory elements are the stretches of DNA that determine when and where genes switch on and off. We are working out the rules they follow and testing those rules by building new elements from scratch.


Cell identity comes down to which genes are on and that is set by cis-regulatory elements: stretches of DNA that integrate signals and transcription factors to control when and where a gene is expressed. They are molecular devices at the centre of every decision a developing cell makes, yet how they work inside a gene regulatory network remains poorly understood. We use genomics and computational methods to find the sites bound by specific transcription factors, then test them with transgenic reporters and gene editing. Analysing these alongside transcriptomic data lets us reconstruct the regulatory logic of the system.

Two rows of transverse neural tube sections, wild-type above and enhancer mutant below, each shown as a merged image and three greyscale channels. In the mutant the Olig2 domain is smaller and the Pax6 domain larger
Deleting an enhancer blurs a boundary. Sections from wild-type and mutant mouse embryos at E9.5, stained for Pax6, Nkx2.2 and Olig2. Removing an enhancer of Olig2 in the mutant shrinks the Olig2 domain, expands the Pax6 domain, and leaves cells intermingled at the boundary with Nkx2.2. Exelby et al., Development 2021

The neural tube generates a large diversity of neurons and glia from a small pool of progenitors, and it does so along two axes, spatial and temporal, that work by different mechanisms. In space, progenitors at different positions share a common set of regulatory elements and differ in which inputs they integrate, a mechanism we call differential binding. In time, a global programme operating in progenitors throughout the nervous system controls which elements are accessible as development proceeds. Perturbing it changes the order in which progenitors switch fate and alters the identity of the cells they produce. The two run in parallel rather than one through the other, so the temporal programme makes elements available when spatial determinants need them. We call this chronotopic integration: a global chromatin programme in time sets what the spatial network can do and together they allocate cell identity in the right order.

Diagram contrasting two mechanisms: along the time axis a global chromatin programme changes which elements are accessible, and along the space axis differential transcription factor binding distinguishes progenitor types
Two axes, two mechanisms. A global chromatin programme opens elements as development proceeds. Differential binding then decides which cell type results. Zhang et al., Developmental Cell 2025

The test of understanding cis-regulatory elements is whether we can build one. We developed a screen that assembles synthetic elements from fragments of natural ones and measures thousands at a time in differentiating stem cells. The rules it produced let us take the Olig2 element apart, permute its segments and predict which arrangements would be stronger or weaker than the original. Synthesising selected elements confirmed both directions and elements designed this way shift the pattern of motor neuron production in neural tissue.

Schematic of redesigning the Olig2 regulatory element by permuting its segments and predicting activity, with the predicted strongest and weakest designs synthesised and measured
Designing a regulatory element. Permuting the segments of the Olig2 element gives a design space of several thousand arrangements. Selected elements were synthesised and behaved as predicted, above and below the natural sequence. Cornwall-Scoones et al., bioRxiv 2025

Precision does not come from individual elements alone. The design of the network matters too. Different levels of transcription factor expression produce distinct gene expression programmes, and the spatial variability introduced by stochastic gene expression can be buffered by the dynamics that the network structure generates. We call this precision by design: some networks are arranged so that the noise inherent in gene expression does not blur the pattern. How regulatory elements behave in context remains largely unknown, and that gap is where most of our current work sits.

Publications

Cornwall-Scoones J, Benzinger D, Yu T, et al., Briscoe J, Delás MJ
Predictable engineering of signal-dependent cis-regulatory elements
bioRxiv (2025)
Zhang I, Boezio GLM, Cornwall-Scoones J, et al., Briscoe J, Delás MJ
The cis-regulatory logic integrating spatial and temporal patterning in the vertebrate neural tube
Developmental Cell 60:3034-3049 (2025)
Delás MJ, Kalaitzis CM, Fawzi T, et al., Briscoe J
Developmental cell fate choice in neural tube progenitors employs two distinct cis-regulatory strategies
Developmental Cell 58:3-17 (2023)
Exelby K, Herrera-Delgado E, Perez LG, Perez-Carrasco R, Sagner A, Metzis V, Sollich P, Briscoe J
Precision of tissue patterning is controlled by dynamical properties of gene regulatory networks
Development 148:dev197566 (2021)

All publications →

Other research areas