Briscoe LabDevelopmental Dynamics of Tissue Formation

Research

Tempo, growth and lineage

Development runs to a schedule and the schedule differs between species. We study what sets the pace, how the time of neuronal generation affects cell type and how lineage determines what each progenitor can make.


Making the right cell types is not enough. They have to appear in the right order and at the right time. The same genes, in the same sequence, are expressed two to three times slower in human than in mouse. We found that differences in protein stability contribute to developmental tempo. Proteins persist longer in human cells and the whole programme slows to match, which makes pace a property of the cell rather than of any single gene. But what controls the rate of protein degradation?

Two rows of neural tube sections stained for PAX6, OLIG2 and NKX2.2. The upper row follows mouse development from embryonic day 9 to 11.5, the lower row follows human development from Carnegie stage 11 to 17, showing the same sequence unfolding over a longer period
The same gene expression programme at two speeds. Mouse above, human below. The progenitor domains form in the same order in both, but the human sequence takes two to three times longer. Rayon et al., Science 2020

The time as well as the position at which a neuron is generated influences its identity. A shared transcriptional code in neural progenitors stratifies neuronal identity by the time at which they are born. This temporal programme operates throughout the central nervous system. Onecut factors mark the earliest neurons, Pou2f2 and Zfhx factors those born in the middle, and Nfib and Neurod2 the latest. The code runs in parallel to spatial patterning, so the position a progenitor occupies and the time at which it differentiates decide which neuron it makes.

Diagram with spatial patterning on the vertical axis and temporal stratification on the horizontal, showing neuronal subtypes born at embryonic days 9.5, 10.5 and 12.5 marked by different transcription factors
Two axes of identity. Position sets which progenitor domain a cell belongs to. A temporal code then stratifies the neurons each domain produces by the day they are born. Sagner et al., PLoS Biology 2021

Chromatin connects the two. A global temporal programme changes which regulatory elements are accessible as development proceeds, making them available for spatial determinants. Perturbing that programme changes the order in which progenitors switch fate and alters the identity of the neurons they go on to make.

Following single progenitors reveals the cellular logic of neural tube patterning. Barcoding cells and reading their descendants in chick and human embryos shows that the neural tube first resolves into five broad lineage subdivisions, which then further split to give rise to the eleven progenitor domains. The first division separates sensory from motor regions. Individual progenitors contribute neurons to several temporal waves while remaining inside their compartment, so spatial identity persists even as temporal competence changes. The architecture is the same in chick and human and in human embryos most fate choices are settled by six weeks after conception.

A matrix of clonal coupling scores between neuronal classes, with five blocks outlined, beside a schematic showing the neural tube dividing into alar and basal halves and then into lineage subdivisions and spatial domains
A hierarchy of decisions. Cells that share a clone cluster into five compartments, which map onto the alar and basal halves of the tube and then onto the progenitor domains. Boezio et al., bioRxiv 2025

Publications

Boezio GLM, Depotter JRL, Frith TJR, Radley A, Strohbuecker S, Cunha AC, Howell M, Briscoe J
Hierarchical lineage architecture of human and avian spinal cord revealed by single-cell genomic barcoding
bioRxiv (2025)
Zhang I, Boezio GLM, Cornwall-Scoones J, et al., Briscoe J, Delás MJ
The cis-regulatory logic integrating spatial and temporal patterning in the vertebrate neural tube
Developmental Cell 60:3034-3049 (2025)
Sagner A, Zhang I, Watson T, Lazaro J, Melchionda M, Briscoe J
A shared transcriptional code orchestrates temporal patterning of the central nervous system
PLoS Biology 19:e3001450 (2021)
Rayon T, Stamataki D, Perez-Carrasco R, et al., Briscoe J
Species-specific pace of development is associated with differences in protein stability
Science 369:eaba7667 (2020)

All publications →

Other research areas